Bombay HC: Complete Responses must for Patent Examination Reports
In the case of Sonalkumar Sureshrao Salunkhe & Ors. v The Assistant Controller of Patents, the Bombay High Court underscored the importance of diligently addressing all objections in the First Examination Report (FER) sufficiently, to avoid the risk of a patent application being deemed ‘abandoned’.
Sonalkumar...
HP High Court: SBB cannot levy access & benefit-sharing fees
In a recent case, Hygienic Research Institute Private Limited v H.P. State Biodiversity Board and others, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Court) held that Indian entities covered under Section 7 of the are not required to seek “prior approval” or to pay the Access and Benefit Sharing Fee (ABS) to the State Biodiversity Board (SBB) for accessing...
Pidilite Seals a Win: Bombay High Court Validates Creative Design Combinations
In Pidilite Industries Limited v Astral Limited, the Bombay High Court passed an ad-interim injunction order to stop Astral Limited (Astral) from manufacturing, selling, dealing and offering to sell a ‘container’ infringing a registered design of a container of Pidilite Industries Limited (Pidilite).
Pidilite sued...
Delhi High Court Bars JK Cement from Using Akzo Nobel’s Trademark
In an important decision, the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi has restrained JK Cement Ltd. (‘JK’) from using the trade mark “WEATHER SHIELD” in relation to cement.
Akzo Nobel Coatings International B V (‘Akzo Nobel’), an international conglomerate, owns one of the world’s most popular paint brands, DULUX which it uses as a...
Delhi High Court’s Progressive Rulings Favor Microsoft in Software Case
In a recent decision by the Delhi High Court, in the case of Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC v Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, the Court reaffirmed that the Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions (CRI), 2017 (CRI Guidelines 2017), which eliminated the novel hardware requirement, must be applied to determine the...
Suppressed Fact Must be Material to allow revisitation of interim injunction
In the case of Novartis AG & Anr. v Natco Pharma Limited, the Delhi High Court dismissed an application by the defendant, Natco Pharma Limited (Natco), an Indian pharmaceutical company, seeking vacation of the interim injunction granted to Novartis AG (Novartis) in 2023 in the ongoing patent infringement suit against...
Delhi High Court Backs Microsoft for Clarity & Global Standards in Patent Cases
In Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC v The Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs, The Patent Office, the Delhi High Court highlighted the necessity for procedural fairness and clarity in the patent examination process to align with principles of natural justice and international patent standards.
Appellant,...
Concerns over handling of personal data by foreign-owned/funded entities
In a recent Public Interest Litigation (PIL) addressed by the Delhi High Court, Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v Union of India, a critical spotlight was cast on the practices of foreign-owned companies that collect personal information through travel booking platforms in India.
This judgment underscores the significant challenges and...
Google penalized by Delhi High Court for misrepresenting disclosures
In a notable judgment in early April, the IP Division of Delhi High Court dismissed Google LLC’s (Google) appeal against the rejection of its patent application by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (Controller), and imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh (~USD 1,200) on the tech giant for presenting incorrect information and failing to disclose...
Delhi High Court awards Ericsson $29 million in SEP case
K&S’ latest article written by Pramod Kumar, Naveen Suriya, and Partner & Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari which analyses the Delhi High Court’s landmark decision to award Ericsson USD 29 million in damages, the highest SEP-related damages awarded in India, for the Patent Lawyer’s newsletter.
Read...