Calcutta HC Remands Patent Rejection Over Section 3(b) of the Patents Act and Procedural Fairness
This breaks down the ITC Ltd. v Controller of Patents judgement. The Calcutta High Court held that a patent cannot be denied under Section 3(b) on morality or public health grounds without clear scientific or technical evidence. It found that the Controller wrongly presumed the invention—a device for generating and delivery of a Nicotine...
Calcutta High Court Issues New IP Division Rules for Efficient Case Management
Senior Associate, Kapil Kumar explores the Calcutta High Court recently adopted the much-awaited Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2023 (Calcutta IPD Rules), making it the third High Court in India, after Delhi and Madras, to implement specialized regulations for IP matters.
While the Calcutta IPD Rules...
Inventiveness Test Should Be Applied to Entire Invention, Not Parts
In the matter of Groz-Beckert Kg v Union of India & Ors, the Calcutta High Court heard the appeal of Groz-Beckert KG (GBKG) against the rejection of their patent application by the Controller of Patents and Designs (Controller).
The case dealt with the issue of whether, can an invention be assessed on its constituent parts, while...
Calcutta High Court Questions Controller’s Rejection of Fungicidal Treatment Method
/*! elementor - v3.16.0 - 20-09-2023 */
.elementor-heading-title{padding:0;margin:0;line-height:1}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title>a{color:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-small{font-size:15px}.elementor-widget-heading...